A bad film - no matter how short - can feel too long. After
all, if it’s no good then all you’re thinking about is how much longer you have
to sit through it. How much longer must you wait before you can leave? If a
film is good though, really good, time flies. You can sit in a cinema for hours
and be so taken in by the story that, before you know it, three hours have gone
by! Some stories, often those which are more complex, more elaborate and more
detailed, simply cannot be told in 90 minutes. Or at least, they cannot be told
well.
Before seeing Cloud Atlas on the big screen, I had heard
plenty about how very long it was
but, having already struggled with the immensely complex novel on which it was
based, I was prepared. I nipped to the loo, ran for the premiere seats, and marvelled
at one of the most ambitious, most impressive films I have ever experienced.
Cloud Atlas lasted 172 minutes (just under three hours) and there is not one
scene I would have lost. Enough had been trimmed already in order to make the
story more palatable.
Similarly, Zero Dark Thirty was a film of great depth which
dealt with political controversy and the very real and current events we all
witnessed post 9/11. It had an incredibly impressive story arc and followed one
woman’s determined mission to track down the world’s most wanted man. The final
twenty minutes were so unbearably tense, I almost forgot to breathe. Zero Dark
Thirty ran for 157 minutes.
We may not have the grand sweeping epics of earlier
Hollywood these days but, for those who are still able, some filmmakers are, fortunately
for film-fans, brave enough to make films that make you think, make you sit
back in awe and ultimately just make you sit still for more than ten minutes.
Which, in the current climate of speed and technology, may just be a marvel in
itself.
Do you have a cut off time when it comes to cinema outings? What longer films do you think are worth sitting that long for...?
Showing posts with label Cloud Atlas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cloud Atlas. Show all posts
Friday, 23 August 2013
Thursday, 14 February 2013
Cloud Atlas: Book vs Film
Cloud Atlas, David Mitchell's sweeping epic tale of six paths connecting over time and space does not leap off the pages as the easiest book to adapt for the big screen. However, Tom Tykwer and Andy and Lana Wachowski didn't let a little thing like complexity stop them adapting it onto the big screen.
The book was one of the most challenging novels I have ever read but man, was I proud when I reached the end of it. The book spans our past, present and future with six different storylines that are connected in some way as each person's soul continues to move through time. One man writes a diary that is read by another, one composes music that is listened to by another....
What made the book such an impressive piece of literature, though, is not just the complexity of weaving six storylines together as one. What Mitchell has managed to achieve with this book is nothing short of miraculous. He uses different styles for each - letters, diary entries, transcribed interviews - and alters the language to suit the era. His intricate prose is simply stunning to behold. It is all about the language he uses but thanks to his insane skill as a writer, the story becomes so much more than the words on the pages.
To adapt this 2004 Man Booker prize-winning book onto the big screen then, presents no end of problems. How do you cater for the sheer number of characters required? How do you compress all the intricacies of such a complex plot into just one film? How do you convey the subtleties of the customs and linguistics of the book in something as overt as a film?
Well first of all, the stellar cast enlisted for the film each played a different role in each of the six storylines, showing the connection between them all the more overtly. The layout has been altered too. While the book stuck with one story, moved onto the next and then worked its way back, the film jumps between them all continuously. This, once again, serves to reinforce the inate connection between everyone.
What the film manages to capture is sublime. With an incredible cast, perfect direction, six different worlds that are entirely immersive and plenty of action, drama, romance and intrigue, the film manages to remain compelling irrespective of its length.
Somehow, though the beautiful language and prose used in the book isn't exactly conveyed onto the big screen, the book adds as an aid. The pair work well as just that - a pair. Understanding the basic concepts of the book beforehand makes it that much easier to follow how each story is linked in the film. If you went into the film knowing nothing, it would probably be a jarring experience that would leave most viewers baffled. It is hard to enjoy something, after all, that just flies over your head. That said, it isn't essential to read the book before seeing the film. A lot is explained and a little research beforehand will suffice.
When I first read the book a couple of years ago, I only gave it 3/5. Yet now, having seen the film and given more thought to the story and what Mitchell achieved, I can appreciate it for what it is. Both book and film are challenging, require constant focus and attention and are certainly not easy to follow but if you have the time and patience, they are both thought-provoking and stunning to behold.
Book and film - 5/5 FOBLES
The book was one of the most challenging novels I have ever read but man, was I proud when I reached the end of it. The book spans our past, present and future with six different storylines that are connected in some way as each person's soul continues to move through time. One man writes a diary that is read by another, one composes music that is listened to by another....
What made the book such an impressive piece of literature, though, is not just the complexity of weaving six storylines together as one. What Mitchell has managed to achieve with this book is nothing short of miraculous. He uses different styles for each - letters, diary entries, transcribed interviews - and alters the language to suit the era. His intricate prose is simply stunning to behold. It is all about the language he uses but thanks to his insane skill as a writer, the story becomes so much more than the words on the pages.
To adapt this 2004 Man Booker prize-winning book onto the big screen then, presents no end of problems. How do you cater for the sheer number of characters required? How do you compress all the intricacies of such a complex plot into just one film? How do you convey the subtleties of the customs and linguistics of the book in something as overt as a film?
Well first of all, the stellar cast enlisted for the film each played a different role in each of the six storylines, showing the connection between them all the more overtly. The layout has been altered too. While the book stuck with one story, moved onto the next and then worked its way back, the film jumps between them all continuously. This, once again, serves to reinforce the inate connection between everyone.
What the film manages to capture is sublime. With an incredible cast, perfect direction, six different worlds that are entirely immersive and plenty of action, drama, romance and intrigue, the film manages to remain compelling irrespective of its length.
Somehow, though the beautiful language and prose used in the book isn't exactly conveyed onto the big screen, the book adds as an aid. The pair work well as just that - a pair. Understanding the basic concepts of the book beforehand makes it that much easier to follow how each story is linked in the film. If you went into the film knowing nothing, it would probably be a jarring experience that would leave most viewers baffled. It is hard to enjoy something, after all, that just flies over your head. That said, it isn't essential to read the book before seeing the film. A lot is explained and a little research beforehand will suffice.
When I first read the book a couple of years ago, I only gave it 3/5. Yet now, having seen the film and given more thought to the story and what Mitchell achieved, I can appreciate it for what it is. Both book and film are challenging, require constant focus and attention and are certainly not easy to follow but if you have the time and patience, they are both thought-provoking and stunning to behold.
Book and film - 5/5 FOBLES
Tuesday, 18 September 2012
Movie Tie-In Edition Cover Revealed for Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell
Before the film adaptation of David Mitchell's incredible book Cloud Atlas hits cinemas early next year, Sceptre - the publishers of the book - have lined up a movie tie-in edition, to be released in November. Check out the gorgeous new book cover below and order your copy now if you haven't yet read it. It's hard work but well worth the effort.
This sweeping epic looks at six seemingly different but somehow connected stories over time using different styles, language and customs to illustrate the changes.
Directed by Lana Wachowski, Andy Wachowski and Tom Tykwer, the film adaptation stars Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Jim Broadbent, Hugh Grant and many, many more...
Check out my review of the book here.
This sweeping epic looks at six seemingly different but somehow connected stories over time using different styles, language and customs to illustrate the changes.
Directed by Lana Wachowski, Andy Wachowski and Tom Tykwer, the film adaptation stars Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Jim Broadbent, Hugh Grant and many, many more...
Check out my review of the book here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


